Jump to content

Talk:Honeywell TPE331

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Question

[edit]

I work at an FBO. A Turbocommander with these engines came in for maintenance. The pilot feathered the right prop and when he shut it off it caught fire for a breif moment. When he got out he said it was normal because he had feathered it. Can someone please explain this to me. I cant see how fire comming from your engine can be "normal". answer: Most 331 engines have a fuel purge feature which is activated on shutdown to push unneeded fuel out of the fuel manifolds. When the operator feathered the engine he bypassed actuation of the purge system. If the operator then places the engine selector to the "engine off" position the purge system will dicharge the residual fuel into the hot engine. If the engine is still rotating fairly fast a lot of smoke will be produced. If the engine is stopped this fuel will often light-off. Although under the right circunstances this can be VERY impressive, it seldom causes more than soot deposits around the exhaust area. With some practice the feather check can be performed and still avoid the "show". Helicoptercrewchief (talk) 02:28, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Specifications

[edit]

I located spex on website of the Canadian Museum of Aviation, and I added them to the article. Someone may wants to delete the request for spex. I upgraded the rating from stub to start based on that added info.--Mack2 (talk) 03:20, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the confusion. The specs tag is also used when the specs template (in this case, {{jetspecs}}, needs to be added. I don't have much experince with engine specs templates, so I just added the tag. Having the tag is not a major deal, it just helps to standardized the output of the specs. It shouldn't affect the start rating. - BillCJ (talk) 03:29, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Just trying to help.--Mack2 (talk) 03:39, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Garrett TPE331. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:43, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Garrett TPE331. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Garrett TPE331. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Updating the article and external links

[edit]

I'm trying to do some additional research to support the content in the article with better sources, but I'm also curious about the external links section. Would it be appropriate to add the official link to the product page in the external links? I know official links are generally allowed under the policy, but I wouldn't want to presume given it could be interpreted as spam. Any thoughts?--FacultiesIntact (talk) 21:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editors: Beware of paid editing!

[edit]

Honeywell in hiring paid editors to "improve" this article (see User:Jveeds), and other articles pertaining to its business.—Finell 00:09, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed the item of costing of service is clearly commercial and inappropriate. I will simply delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.27.164.198 (talk) 10:00, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]