Jump to content

Talk:Honeycomb structure

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

where are honey comb structure panels produced? which country and what are the latest inventions .

As far as I know, the world leaders are Euro-Composites (Luxembourg) and Hexcel (USA). --Oliver Tölkes (talk) 19:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Junkers patent does not support honeycomb structure claim - please provide direct evidence

[edit]

It is parroted about the internet that this Junkers patent DE310040 somehow patents or discloses honeycomb laminant sturtures, yet what I've seen of it does not support this.

Does someone have direct evidence of this claim (or is this just another perpetually repeated internet fiction) ??? Wikibearwithme (talk) 08:07, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Honeycomb structure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Honeycomb structure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merger Proposal

[edit]

I propose to merge Paper honeycomb into Honeycomb structure. The article for Paper honey comb is stub & missing references. Basically most of the details are already included in the honeycomb structure article and could easily accommodate any of the details missing with out making it too long. Triscal (talk) 02:12, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting, rather than merging, as there is no referenced material to merge. Klbrain (talk) 20:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]