This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
One possible trajectory for this homework essay is to use it as a starting point for an article on homogenous catalytic hydrogenation. There is no reason to disparage this thing, but we do not want to encourage a series on [your-metal-here]-catalyzed hydrogenation. If other editors have questions or concerns let me know. --Smokefoot (talk) 09:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Having looked at it, our article on hydrogenation is already well divided into homogeneous and heterogeneous sections. So we would have to be careful not to have this end-up as a content fork. Homogeneous hydrogenation catalysts are becoming more important industrially, particularly Rh,Ru,Ir-diphosphines, as they can work at loading of 0.01 mol% or below.--Project Osprey (talk) 15:56, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, good thoughts. I was feeling horrified with the predecessor article but should have looked around. Maybe we should redirect this thing to there. --Smokefoot (talk) 17:26, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That seems like a better option; once you take out the lead and generalized-comments, the remaining info is small enough to merged sensibly. I think the hydrogenation article could also do with a revamp, like a lot of our older top-level pages it's seen years of minor edits which have resulted in it becoming quite disjointed. --Project Osprey (talk) 10:22, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
