Jump to content

Talk:Homo technologicus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Evolution

[edit]

I believe homo sapiens are evolving, but to which end I cannot predict. There seems to be favouritism towards developed countries, meaning those living in the third world are worst off. The reasons vary from cultural to socio-economical. There is a greater concentration of genetic variety amongst these people, especially in Africa. This would sustain diversity and prolong our existence as a spicies, but desease, femine and war also seems to be putting these people at risk of extinction. As a people many of them seem to lack the genetic traits to be self sufficient and as a result, are unable to eliviate themselves from the inevitable. A new spicies of man is coming and its arrival will be met with fear and lack of tolerance, as is always the case between different groups of people. We are a rapidly evolving spicies, highly adaptable and highly intelligent, to the point of self-distruction. Thabang Ngoma, Kempton Park, Johannesburg, RSA.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Homo technologicus article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject. --Loremaster 17:11, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does this article need to exist?

[edit]

One made up word by one guy, supported by one little paragraph. Seriously? --207.159.180.63 (talk) 15:07, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As a Google search indicates, the word has been used by several people so I don't Yves Gingras coined it. I therefore suggest we either expand the article or we merge it with the List of alternative names for the human species article. --Loremaster (talk) 20:11, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've decided that we should merge the content of the Homo technologicus article with the List of alternative names for the human species article and redirect the former to the latter. --Loremaster (talk) 20:19, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Loremaster (talk) 02:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]