Talk:Homer's Night Out/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Hi, I will be reviewing your article, Homer's Night Out. It looks very good. There is a typo that I'll just fix myself. I will be posting further comments here.Please feel free to contact me. —Mattisse (Talk) 20:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- "Bart wanders into the room" - this is another room than the restaurant, I take it, a party room of some sort? This part is a little vague for someone unfamiliar with the episode.
- Since you describe the costumes of the "showgirls" under Production (and have a still of a costume), it would be better if you described their presence in the plot more clearly.
- Otherwise, the article seems to fulfill the criteria for GA. I will give a full review when you respond. —Mattisse (Talk) 21:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! I have made some edits now, let me know what you think! =) TheLeftorium 06:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- Per MOS:LINK#Dates, autoformatting of dates is now depreciated so I delinked them. —Mattisse (Talk) 15:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- I am pleased to pass this article for GA. —Mattisse (Talk) 15:42, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- Awesome, thanks! BTW, I noticed that in the ratings paragraph the date says "19-25 March March 1990", shouldn't it be "19-25 March 1990"? TheLeftorium 15:47, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yes. Sometimes the script screws up. I check it visually but don't always catch everything. It needs to be corrected. —Mattisse (Talk) 16:02, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- Awesome, thanks! BTW, I noticed that in the ratings paragraph the date says "19-25 March March 1990", shouldn't it be "19-25 March 1990"? TheLeftorium 15:47, 16 September 2008 (UTC)