Talk:Homeart

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Homeart is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

The reason I created this page is that the Copperart store was somewhat on an Australian institution in the 1980s and 1990s. It was the subject of much parody both by comedians but also by people generally, who saw the products sold by it as total rubbish. It captures the retail environment in Australia in the 1980s and 1990s, and shows the evolution of the store into something, which frankly, is just about as rubbishy anyway.

I've withdrawn the speedy for now. —BradV 23:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No notable value in this article.

Quite an obvious attempt to discredit the company and it's owners.

No evidence to support claims of why the page was created.

What reason is there to list a court case that was won by Copperart, in a page that was created on a supposed Australian institution that is then described as rubbish?

Request immediate speedy deletion.

Narff (talk) 01:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

logo

Please put on homeart's logo 180.222.0.158 (talk) 08:43, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]