Talk:HomeLink Wireless Control System

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of HomeLink Wireless Control System be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Contesting speedy

I think this product has some degree of notability, given the number of autos it's installed in -- I also note on another WP page that it won a trade award back in 1997. (And of course, it passes my first test for notability: I had occasion to look it up :-).

I plan to flesh this out a bit, noting the award and prevalence in the field. This should at least move it from a speedy candidate to AfD-class...

I'd also contest whether it's "blatant advertising": the article as it stands today is stubby, but it's a straightforward description of what the protect is and what it does. No peacock terms or excessive claims; it just doesn't establish notability in any way.

Note that I don't have any connection to the product other than it being a standard feature in all the automobiles I own, which is why I was looking for a better description of it.--NapoliRoma (talk) 17:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

I think an extra, third party source, would do a lot to help this page out. Undeath (talk) 03:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]