Talk:Holy See–United Kingdom relations

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

European Microstates: Vatican City

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Vatican City portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vatican City (assessed as Mid-importance).

Catholicism Low‑importance

Holy See–United Kingdom relations is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Dubious

"Diplomatic links between the Kingdom of England and the Holy See were established in 1479"

You gotta be kidding, right? The kingdom of England had diplomatic links with the Holy See from the time of its incarnation. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 22:41, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

England only began formal embassies in 1479. Whatever relationship with Christianity was not diplomatic, find a reference that talk about Christianity in Britain. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:39, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, the statement is still dubious. The English king, at least from the Norman era onward, has almost continual representation with the bishop of Rome. "Formal diplomatic links between the Kingdom of England and the Holy See were established in 1479" is not justified by the fact that they appointed an official ambassador in this year. That's roughly what the FaCO source says, but this source isn't reliable on these matters, as is plainly obvious from the inability of its author to grasp the anachronism. Get rid of the statement and replace it with something like "the kingdom of England had formal diplomatic relations with the papacy for centuries, but according to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office the first official ambassador was X". If you want more details about England's formal relations with the Papacy earlier, you can use reliable sources like this or this Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 04:42, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, why don't you fill in the missing 1,000 years. I am sure a lot can be taken for the article on Christianity in Britain and Wales. I agree the relationship is there, it just needs to be filled in. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 06:49, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone fix the map pleaseandycjp (talk) 12:22, 22 May 2010 (UTC)?[reply]

British Sovereign and Vatican visits

The comment that the audience given by Pope Pius XII to Princess Margaret in 1949 was the first meeting of a Pontiff and member of the British Royal Family since the Reformation is wrong. King Edward VII met privately with Pope Leo XIII in the Vatican in 1903, as did his son and daughter-in-law, King George V and Queen Mary, with Pope Pius XI in 1923. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.216.162 (talk) 16:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Holy See–United Kingdom relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20101115122617/http%3A//ukinholysee.fco.gov.uk/en/about%2Dus/our%2Dembassy/ambassador/previous%2Dambassador to http://ukinholysee.fco.gov.uk/en/about-us/our-embassy/ambassador/previous-ambassador

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:15, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The NOTNEWS policy is a poor excuse to cover up the ongoing reconciliation process

It only applies to breaking stories, routine news reporting of announcements, sports, or celebrities, mentioning of individuals beyond specified event, and resemblance of diaries. This encyclopedic fact which was added after the event happened doesn't have any of this stuff.JoeScarce (talk) 20:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Meh, it isn't relevant. WP:NOTNEWS exists so people don't get carried away and give undue prominence to recent or emerging events. None of the sources actually say this is a major reconciliation event and Argentina just elected a hard core Peronist Government intent on ratcheting up tensions over the Falklands as they always do when they're in economic trouble. You are seriously misguided here. I would strongly suggest you self-revert and stop edit warring. Some light reading for you WP:OWB, WP:NPA and WP:BRD. I fear your wiki career is destined to be a short one and this will end in tears if you can't edit collaboratively. W C M_email 01:45, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]