Talk:Holy Jesus Hospital/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 19:16, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Initial review

Like the last GAR, there are still problems with the prose; and with in-line citations/references - mostly concerned with their layout. I will attempt to improve some of these problems.Pyrotec (talk) 17:32, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

GAR

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A good article that needed some attention to its citations, these were addressed during the GAR

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

I'm awarding GA.Pyrotec (talk) 20:26, 5 December 2008 (UTC)