Talk:Holmes v. South Carolina

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Holmes v. South Carolina appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 May 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the unanimous decision Holmes v. South Carolina (reversing the conviction of a man who was barred from arguing that another man committed the crime) was the first decision written by Samuel Alito as a Supreme Court Justice?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/May.

Wikipedia

i, yakbasser, was present when this case was argued before the supreme cout Yakbasser 23:42, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Cool! Got a picture of the justices at work? ++Lar: t/c 14:30, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK Nom

This article is a remarkable piece of work and worthy of showcasing for editing prowess. It's just not very exciting! ++Lar: t/c 14:30, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FA candidate then? ; ) Postdlf 18:17, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And thank you for the glowing comments... Postdlf 18:18, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome and who knows, it might get picked... as for FA? Maybe... I'm no expert. GA certainly. ++Lar: t/c 19:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aftermath

I was wondering what happened after the supreme court case, and found that the defendant plead guilty right before the third trial. https://www.heraldonline.com/news/local/article12226619.html 2603:3012:571:6000:B8EB:9869:F167:C311 (talk) 19:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]