Talk:Holly Theatre (Medford, Oregon)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TheCatalyst31 (talk · contribs) 00:26, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article fails criterion #3, breadth of coverage, as it is missing much of the information I'd expect in a good article. In particular, there is no description of the building or of its significant architectural features, which I'd expect in an article about an important work of a notable architect. The history of the building is sparse, as there's only five sentences about the first fifty years of the theater's existence, much less than I'd expect for what appears to be its most significant period of operation. The lead section is only once sentence long and thus doesn't effectively summarize the article. The first reference claims the building has a Spanish Colonial design, which contradicts the article, and the photo seems to agree with the reference; that such a key fact about the building is incorrect makes me unconvinced that this article meets the verifiability criteria. Because of the substantial amount of writing which it would take to improve this article to GA standards, I'm going to quick fail it; feel free to resubmit it once these concerns are addressed. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 00:26, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]