Jump to content

Talk:Holly Ringland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 01:23, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Damien Linnane (talk). Self-nominated at 04:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Holly Ringland; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

Image eligibility:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: For notability, I assume we use the WP:ANYBIO instead of using the typical WP:AUTHOR criteria. She got a national level award, that should then be eligible. Some edits might be needed:

  • The source for the early life section does not indicate the number of years that she traveled around US and Canadian parks. If no clear citation, we should drop the "two years".
I've added an additional source for this.
  • I couldn't find a reference on her early careers on Gold Coast Indy 300, data entry, call centre work and temporary work. If you have a source, please add. Or if I missed that from the source, it will be great if you can provide a quote from the sources.
I've moved the existing source as an inline citation to make it clearer.
  • The 2023 adaptation to a miniseries is sourced by a 2018 article?
Good catch. I put the wrong inline citation there. It's fixed now.

If the above items are addressed, then it should be good to go. Z22 (talk) 02:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Z22: Thanks for your comments. I've addressed everything. Damien Linnane (talk) 03:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Damien Linnane:You have addressed those points. Thank you. I think for the last point though, the source only vaguely mentioned the TV show without giving details. It will be super solid if you use this NY Times article, If you incorporate this source, then it should be good to go. Z22 (talk) 03:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Z22: Great source; thanks for sharing. I've put this in the article now. Damien Linnane (talk) 05:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good now. This is good to go. Z22 (talk) 11:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]