Talk:Holly Holliday/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 21:36, 5 July 2013 (UTC) Okay, I'm going to take this article on.[reply]

Development

What about "The role of Holly was created by series co-creator Ryan Murphy, specifically for Paltrow, a personal friend. Murphy suggested that"
- Done Robin (talk) 17:53, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The sentence about Glee: The 3D Concert Movie sort of runs on. Can you think of any info that could be dropped, or can you split it into two sentences?
- Dropped some info. Robin (talk) 17:53, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a few edits in this section, that can be seen in the edit summaries.

Musical performances

There's enough prose between the first references to Mr. Poniewozik, that people would have to hunt to find out who he is. Thus, I've repeated his outlet.
Can you at least make reference to how "Forget You" is sanitized? A decade from now, people might be watching that episode of Glee, and using this article as a reference guide, but never have heard Cee-lo perform it.
- Better? Robin (talk) 17:53, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Would it help readers to reference the source of the term "hairography"? I can see people be tripped up, even though it's mostly defined by the rest of the sentence.
- No, I don't think so + "hairography" directs to the season one Glee episode of the same name.
Landslide is linked to from both Storylines and Musical performances. Turning Tables is linked to from only Storylines. Which is the standard, or even your personal standard? There is a fair distance between the first and second instances of the link/would-be link.
- I've unlinked Landslide, having always followed the template of only linking in the first reference. Robin (talk) 17:53, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so that's it for today, more possibly Saturday. -- Zanimum (talk) 21:36, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking this one! Robin (talk) 17:53, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(After you reply to any questions/concerns for those two sections, they'll both be ready for GA. I picked those sections at random, but I presume the others will be similarly easy-breasy. -- Zanimum (talk) 21:38, 5 July 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Critical reception

The NAMI reference needs to be filled out more, to say who published the page they're clicking on. (It's unfortunate I can't find any news outlets cover this, but not a deal breaker for GA.)
- This has been done by BlueMoonset. Robin (talk) 01:13, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'll do another read through the whole way through tonight, but I think that's it. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:44, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great stuff, I've read through again and nothing more needs to be said. Pass! -- Zanimum (talk) 00:48, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]