Talk:Hollows (series)

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Crime task force.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

Alternate History (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternate History, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Alternate HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Alternate HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Alternate HistoryAlternate History articles

SPOILERS NEEDED

This Hollows page gives away way too much information, especially the characters section. There should be spoilers, or at least warnings, for those who find the page while in the process of reading the series so every single cliff hanger of every single book isn't given away by accident. (Section added June 16, 2008 by User:Powers4Good

This is a difficult case. Basically, WP:Spoiler says now that WP does not contain spoilers, but on the corresponding talk page, you see the fight about that. My opinion is that an article shall show the important facts, especially if they are the plot surprise, and not tease. --Rolf b (talk) 10:05, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly agree, I just finished this very excellent series and am looking forward to the next book. Revealing that Rachel will have demon children is a very unfortunate spoiler. It's a disservice to the author and readers to reveal this without a caution. --Tsingi (talk) 18:24, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You, in turn, just spoiled this for me. Thanks for that. 99.49.229.249 (talk) 21:43, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a spoiler caution, reword it if you must, but please don't take it out. --Tsingi (talk) 18:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I (luckily) didn't have it spoilt for me, but I can totally understand you guys' frustration about it happening. Not knowing enough about Wiki's yet I editted the HUGE spoilers out of it. - Rachel having babies. - Jenks' family drama. - Some book 7 spoilers for Al.

Really nothing that should be so easily read, or make a separate page concerning the characters themselves in detail. Not a general overview about the series.

Note : I read the Spoiler article on Wiki here... Maybe it wasn't a good move that I deleted it, doubt anyone will complain though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RichardRemus (talk • contribs) 19:40, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Morgan

Given that other lead characters of a series of novels often have their own entries, or at least a section of their own, shouldn't there be more information about Rachel Morgan herself? If Richard Sharpe can have his own page, why not Rachel?(72.144.183.207 00:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Corrections and Cleanup

There was (and probably still is) a lot of references that are not clear enough, and can easily lead to mistakes. I tried to correct a few, specially the description of The Turn. If some other fans could help on this, I'm sure everyone would appreciate. morcego (talk) 02:43, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Female witches have either a different muscular arrangment, or more muscles in their pelvises. Male witches are not as endowed as human males, so when witches have sex, those pelvic muscles come into play and tie the witches together, not unlike dogs, though in this case it is the female's anatomy instead of the male's that does it. The female has little or no control of this function. Racheal and Pierece have sex in Black Magic Sanction, and mentions this little fact. She also mentions that the better the sex, the longer the tie lasts.Green Herring (talk) 20:08, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i think how werewolfs came to be is wrong women who wanted a vanity curse were forced to change into wolves then have sex with a wolf the intercourse would always lead to a birth that could shift (i think its from fist full of charms)

Interwiki

The interwiki links were all very general for either science fiction or fantasy. They aren't appropriate for a specific series such as this. I have therefore deleted them. Aleta ^Sing 21:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Information needed

It would be helpful if someone could add publication dates, publishers, etc. The chronologies are not as helpful if you don't know where to find the books and stories.

Also, a bit nitpicky, but I would really like to see some sort of citation for all of this summarizing - is it the author's? A collaboration of fans?

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.216.157.125 (talk) 22:01, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone familiar with this series care to add it to this list?

Types of mythological or fantastic beings in contemporary fiction is a page of, well, fantasy works (movie, TV, written, whatever) and the assorted mythological and/or fantastic critters they contain. This series would qualify. Anyone care to add it? Tamtrible (talk) 18:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]