Talk:Holding (law)
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
swap with Holding (dab)
[edit]I dont see why Holding (the legal term) is the most relevant article for the word holding; IMO the legal term should be moved to Holding (law) and the dab page moved to Holding. There are many other uses of this term that have not yet been covered on the dab page, such as library holding. John Vandenberg 08:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Or, alternatively, should this article be merged into Ratio decidendi?? Yours, Famspear 20:55, 2 January 2007 (UTC)