Talk:Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Backpay
[edit]I deleted the the suggestion that Hoffman Plastics is read by some as allowing backpay, since this goes explicitly against the holding. I also described the holding more accurately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.84.59.222 (talk) 16:06, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
- Nonsense. Hoffman doesn't mention FLSA at all. Some law review articles inexplicably read Hoffman to state otherwise, but no Court has yet held so (the 2d Cir and 11th Cir have held that DESPITE Hoffman, FLSA applies to illegals... remains in flux nationwide). Reverting that back. 75.81.51.96 (talk) 07:23, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
I added IRCA, NLRA, court decision, case background, and rerwrote original introduction and added various elements to it. JRoberts202 (talk) 22:26, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
[edit]This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Massachusetts, Amherst supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:24, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- Stub-Class U.S. Supreme Court articles
- Unknown-importance U.S. Supreme Court articles
- WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases articles
- Stub-Class law articles
- Unknown-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Stub-Class organized labour articles
- Unknown-importance organized labour articles
- WikiProject Organized Labour articles
- Wikipedia Ambassador Program student projects, 2012 Spring