Talk:Ho Chi Minh City/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 13:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

File:Sfone logo.png - File:Vinaphone logo.png, and File:HoChiMinhCityFC.png need Non-free media use rationale for inclusion in this article
One image is captioned Saigon Port should be Ho Chi Minh for consistancy
There are way too many images at the end of the article
Text squeezed betwen two images
There is an almost total lack of references and should only be start class not B
Bare url references used
Wikipedia used as a reference
Web references without access dates
Ref 13 "Yearbook of the Encyclopedia Americana (2006)". p.175. needs adding to a bibliography

To allow work on the article which I do not believe can be completed in teh time I am quickfailing. Jim Sweeney (talk) 13:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]