Talk:Hit and Run (Better Call Saul)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Newtothisedit (talk · contribs) 04:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Five months is far too long to be stuck in the GA Review backlog, especially for a topic as good as BCS. I'll start leaving comments in the next 1-3 days.--Newtothisedit (talk) 04:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Is it well written
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
Comments
[edit]- "The house is revealed to be the operations center of people who are surveilling Gus Fring's house" change to "Their house is revealed to be the operations center of people who are surveilling Gus Fring's home.
- She is the first Better Call Saul cast member to direct an episode of the series." change to "She became the first Better Call Saul cast member to direct an episode of the series." I would also add something about Esposito directing later on.
- "she would work with Michelle MacLaren to break down episodes" add MacLaren's role on the show
- "but by the time Better Call Saul had been ready to shoot there" change to "but by the time Better Call Saul was ready to shoot there"
- "The only scene Seehorn had to watch the playback during filming" change to "The only scene Seehorn had to watch the playback of during filming"
That's all I have, very well written article good job!--Newtothisedit (talk) 18:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Newtothisedit:
Done A person in Georgia (talk) 04:22, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Promoting it Newtothisedit (talk) 05:23, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.