Talk:Hit Parader

Magazines Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Rock music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

POV

The POV on this article is heavily critical and biased. It is not neutral at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.233.222.93 (talk) 20:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hit Parader Top 100 Metal Vocalist

I don't know where else to post this, so I'm posting here this. I noticed that there's on many vocalist reference that they have been voted as one of Hit Parader Top 100 Metal Vocalist. I really don't know if this magazine is famous or anything, but I think that those references should be removed. Why? Well, have you seen that list? I'm sure that every person who knows at least a bit of metal/rock would say that is, pardon my french, a piece of crap. Why? Becouse many singers listed have absolutely nothing to do with metal. I'll just name few, becouse I really couldn't read the whole list. So here they are: Freddy Mercury, Paul Rodgers, Mick Jagger, Roger Daltrey, Kurt Cobain, Steve Perry, Steve Marriott, Anthony Kiedis, Jimi Hendrix, Rod Stewart, Bob Marley??? Yes, appearantly Rod Stewart and Bob Marley are heavy metal singers. I bet that they didn't even know that. Those are just few, not to mention that most of the rest of them are much more hard rock then heavy metal singers. So, could we please not quote this so called "top list" on Wikipedia? --93.136.29.59 (talk) 12:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Past Tense?

The article implies that HP is defunct i.e. "was...", yet based on the link provided, it has a new issue "On newsstands now". This needs clarification. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.39.177.76 (talk) 16:20, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think the magazine is currently owned and/or published by Magna Publishing Group. Geneisner (talk) 02:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hit Parader. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100808115141/http://www.hitparader.com/ to http://www.hitparader.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]