Jump to content

Talk:History of the Portland Timbers franchise

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Not sure why it's tagged for copyright. Everything on this article was from the Portland Timbers Wikipedia pages. So unless one of those related club pages have a copyright infringement, this wasn't done intentionally. Twwalter (talk) 00:22, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Three Timbers Clubs

[edit]

There have been three different Timbers' clubs. This article gives the impression that all three were the same franchise. The coaches and ownership tables need to be separated to reflect that. Also, this article reflects WP:Recentism. KitHutch (talk) 14:47, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is no consensus on this issue on Wikipedia and should be the providence of the page creators, not some disinterested entity with an agenda. The way the team is portrayed is verifiable in the media, which according to Wikipedia's standards is what should count but only doesn't because Wikipedia doesn't have any mechanism to enforce and properly mediate between subjective and objective arguments. This is especially true in less regulated and ancillary topics like sports and entertainment. If this were a physics topic, it would be much more tightly mediated. The only place where this idea is ruthlessly applied are on the MLS articles for whatever reason, yet there are examples of clubs in other sports and leagues where the club's history is allowed to be portrayed as the owners of the franchise and it's history want it portrayed. This idea is only pushed by a cabal of Wiki editors. There are exactly zero articles or references by MLS or the Timbers that state anything about needing to separate Portland's history into distinct group. Hopefully in a decade or so when all of the idiots on this Wiki Project tire and lose interest this will go away. unak1978 09:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of the Portland Timbers franchise. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:19, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on History of the Portland Timbers franchise. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]