Talk:History of the National Hockey League (1917–1942)/GA1

GA Review

Any comments are welcome during the review Lego K^ontribs T^alk M 05:24, 19 June 2008 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
~~Per WP:ENGVAR the article should be in either British English or American English. I would recommend British English, as the NHL was mostly in Canada at the time.~~

Checked, and now passing

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Covers Canadian teams as well as American teams evenly.

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
History looks fine
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
~~On Hold~~

Passed

I've checked for consistency in dialect, and by my eye, it appears to consistently use Canadian English. i.e.: words like colour, honour, defence and offence are spelled using Brtish style, and words like "regularize" are spelled with the -ize suffix rather than -ise. These are both consistent with Canadian spellings. Are there any specific words or passages you are concerned with? Thanks! Reso lute 14:59, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations the article is now a good article. Lego K^ontribs T^alk M 19:15, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]