Talk:History of the Green Bay Packers

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Green Bay Packers Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Bay Packers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Green Bay Packers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Green Bay PackersWikipedia:WikiProject Green Bay PackersTemplate:WikiProject Green Bay PackersGreen Bay Packers articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Split

There doesn't appear to be any info on this page that is not also present in the article for Green Bay Packers or other articles, thus not worthy of its own entry. I suggest this article be absorbed into the main entry, or the duplicious info be removed from the other entry, so this article would actually be useful. ---Jackel 22:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article was made so the history section could be reduced and the history could be expanded. It was recommended on Wikiproject NFL. Don't know if there are any editors willing to clean this up. It's on my to do list now, but don't know when I'll be able to get to it.++aviper2k7++ 22:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since posting my original comments, I've noted that other teams have a special "history" page, so I guess my suggestion is that this page be maintained, and the Packers page be purged of info that is present here. Its pretty long. ---Jackel 04:50, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do that this week, it's atop my to-do list.++aviper2k7++ 05:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I took the tag off this is standard practice, also see my comments on the ratings comment page. Quadzilla99 01:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems that this article is too long and too subjective.--Ankh39 17:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bears suck. ---Cutler's Vaginal Tear (2012)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:History of the Green Bay Packers/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Needs references, a longer lead, and some photos (following fair use policies of course). Quadzilla99 10:12, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See History of the New York Giants for an example of a good article on the subject. Quadzilla99 10:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it needs significant expansion. Quadzilla99 07:42, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 07:42, 24 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 18:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of the Green Bay Packers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060923205832/http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/55/5531000.html to http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/55/5531000.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:07, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]