Jump to content

Talk:History of capitalist theory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bias! "Modern economics rejects the labor theory of value in favor of Marginalism?

[edit]

"In modern times, the labor theory of value has been discredited in favor marginalism." Okay, who wrote this cringe? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.178.84.103 (talk) 05:19, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That statement stood out as being a bit weird to me as well. The issue with that statement is that it is bias being presented as non-bias. This is the full quote:

"Modern economics rejects the labor theory of value in favor of marginalism."

There are many modern Economists who believe and use the labour theory of value. Claiming modern economics rejects the labour theory of value implies that it's not used by any economists anymore, which simply isn't true. Or, even worse, it implies that economics is a hard science rather than a social science, that no subjectivity exists within economics and that the Labour Theory of Value has been discredited in a similar manner to an incorrect scientific theory about the physical world (which simply isn't true).

I'm going to change it to make it less biased. Earthywingnut (talk) 00:51, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is what I've changed it too:
"Many economists have since used marginalism to dispute the the Labour theory of Value" I think this is less biased than it was before. Earthywingnut (talk) 01:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism

[edit]

Max Weber's The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism should be mentioned in this article.

capital as money

[edit]

Marx does not define capital as "money"; nor does he use them interchangeably. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.206.19.130 (talk) 02:15, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Capitalism

[edit]

Obviously there's too much to merge, but following best faith process. Lycurgus (talk) 23:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


In the Overview there's too much Ayn Rand nonsense. What does Altruism and all that gobblygook have to do with the History of Capitalist Theory? Why isn't M. Keynes mentioned in the overview instead of a novelist?

) Did this help you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.244.203.10 (talk) 19:52, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DMCA

[edit]

Greets:

I found this page via a DMCA request. I'm placing this here in the hopeful attempt that the reviewer from Google sees this. If you look at the Copyscape page which is dated, the report generated is dated 2013. If you look at the publishyourarticles date of copyright, it's dated 2012. (There's no publication date listed visible or within the outputted source so you have to assume that the copyright date applies.) Going back through the page history here, the section copyscape marked was added in before 2012. (I finally gave up looking to see when it was added.) The DMCA claim appears to be false at the requester copied the material and is not claiming it as their own. --168.215.131.150 (talk) 17:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of capitalist theory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of capitalist theory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_capitalist_theory&oldid=1202730047"