Talk:History of St Kilda

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Start‑class Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scottish Islands Low‑importance

	Scottish islands portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scottish Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands in Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Scottish IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject Scottish IslandsTemplate:WikiProject Scottish IslandsScottish Islands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tetanus

I do not think that the disease "tetanus infantum" was brought in by boat, it was the local midwife's custom of annointing the cut umbilical cord with contaminated fulmar oil that caused this . I can give references and expand on this if needed ?

(A mention of the exile of the Lady Grange to this island would not come amiss.) oops.. it's in the main article.... sorry! 86.27.177.218 23:09, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article was supposed to be calved off the main one, but hasn't experienced the expansion it perhaps should have. --MacRusgail 18:11, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Puff Inn

I am the current barman of the Puff Inn on St Kilda and the article is incorrect in that the Puff Inn is not, and never has been, a licensed bar. It falls under different rules for MOD messing facilities. When they stopped allowing day-trippers to use the bar, they did release a statement which can be read here - http://www.kilda.org.uk/puffinnstatement.htm#.U30tbPldW_Q

I'm not sure of decent wording to update this though?

I'd also like to see it mentioned that it was Sunday Mail's pub of the month in July 1976! Samuelrichardscott (talk) 22:50, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

From the statement: "...it was vital that procedures were tightened up to ensure the St Kilda site is managed in accordance with standard MOD practice". Vital? Really? Sounds a bit jobsworth to me.45ossington (talk) 08:06, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of St Kilda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]