Talk:History of Scotland/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: EggRoll97 (talk · contribs) 15:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Plagiarism?
[edit]I got a 99.4% match for plagarism from this link. Care to elaborate? EggRoll97 (talk) 04:51, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Take a look at the site that came up positive on the plagiarism search and then think about who copied who - I think it is pretty obvious!! [1] Is anyone volunteering to contact them and suggest that they acknowledge Wikipedia rather than take all the credit for themselves?
ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 08:18, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- @ThoughtIdRetired: Nevermind, now that I look it again, it's a bit suspicious that a tour website would have a Wikipedia-style description of Scotland. EggRoll97 (talk) 08:28, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- @EggRoll97: Thanks for reviewing – yeah, that's clearly plagiarism on their part rather than ours. A quick look at the page history shows that the prose was composed by several users over several years - plagiarising that website so slowly with so many sockpuppets would arguably have been a greater effort than just creating new prose, haha! --Newbiepedian (talk · C · X! · L) 00:13, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Review Finished
[edit]With that, I've finished this review. Thanks to everyone, and congratulations! EggRoll97 (Let's talk!) 00:23, 24 July 2018 (UTC)