Talk:History of Mumbai/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- Starting GA review.Pyrotec (talk) 20:47, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
My plan is to do an initial review and to follow it up with a more detailed GA review to check references and sources, etc. Some of the grammar is a bit stilted in the WP:lead but that should not be too hard to fix. What does worry me, at the start, is the number of WP:red links in the Islamic and Portuguese periods. These may result in the article going On Hold. I mention this at the start of the GA review, so that it can be considered now.Pyrotec (talk) 21:20, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Removed all Over-red linking of Portuguese officers etc.... KensplanetTalkContributions 04:31, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- I disagree with the red link removal. Most of them would have been notable leaders of the sixteenth century. Removing it would lend a sense of systemic bias that favours recentism over historical figures. =Nichalp «Talk»= 09:20, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
- It's not actually my decision. The GA reviewer has told that the article may go on Hold if the articles are not created. KensplanetTC 11:37, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations, I'm awarding GA-status.Pyrotec (talk) 14:11, 31 December 2008 (UTC)