Talk:History of MSNBC: 2008–2015

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microsoft Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Biased Sources

Source 11 (concerning the controversy between Olbermann and Matthews) is filled with speculation, weasel words, and it only references other pages on the same tabloid-ish news site and Olbermann Watch. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.251.243.16 (talk) 16:25, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help

I need to article to be cleaned up. Thanks.--Mapple001 (talk) 22:35, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mapple, please see Talk:MSNBC#Merger proposal. TomCat4680 (talk) 22:38, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Date?

The section of "third prime time lineup" is not out of date because its still significant in my opinion. And just because the position wasn't filled, doesn't mean that it won't be filled in the future.--Mapple001 (talk) 19:02, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok well at least change the tense to let readers know it is currently on hold. Its in both present tense and past tense, its kind of confusing. TomCat4680 (talk) 19:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. --Mapple001 (talk) 19:19, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite

I think this article needs much more than a cleanup. Each section is too short to stand alone. The intro is not representative of the article as a whole, and the entire article is written in a haphazard, informal manner. ----Dgood3001 (talk) 00:59, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk to Mapple001 about that, he thinks it needs to be divided up into separate articles. TomCat4680 (talk) 03:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in History of MSNBC: 2008-present

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of History of MSNBC: 2008-present's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "lat080929":

From The Rachel Maddow Show (TV series): Gold, Matea (September 29, 2008). "MSNBC's new liberal spark plug Rachel Maddow, political junkie and TV rookie, launches to surprising ratings". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved March 11, 2010.
From Rachel Maddow: MSNBC's new liberal spark plug Rachel Maddow, political junkie and TV rookie, launches to surprising ratings Los Angeles Times Retrieved 2010-03-11

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:55, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is now repaired. -Salamurai (talk) 04:30, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings

It is pretty hilarious how both this entry and the main "MSNBC" entry are filled with references as to how MSNBC beats CNN in the ratings, how Rachel Maddow has made them competitive in the ratings (I guess having an audience less than half the size of your main competitor is what passes for "competitive" when discussing MSNBC), how MSNBC outdraws CNN's Larry King, etc. yet not a single mention is made of how badly Fox News destroys MSNBC in the ratings. What a surprise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.154.75 (talk) 04:15, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of MSNBC: 2008–2015. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080528031025/http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/original/1Q%2708%20%28LIVESD%29%20FINAL%20P2%20Cable%20News%20Program%20Ranker.pdf to http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/original/1Q%2708%20%28LIVESD%29%20FINAL%20P2%20Cable%20News%20Program%20Ranker.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of MSNBC: 2008–2015. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121018164036/http://www.nola.com/newsflash/index.ssf/story/olbermann-and-msnbc-a-failing-relationship/57702fa659d04dbe922568dc7e5e3a4a to http://www.nola.com/newsflash/index.ssf/story/olbermann-and-msnbc-a-failing-relationship/57702fa659d04dbe922568dc7e5e3a4a

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What do the letters in MSNBC stand for?

I’ve wondered about this for years. Off the top of my head it seems like Microsoft & NBC. Either way I think this should be addressed. Ginrnbsn (talk) 17:39, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]