Talk:History of Hong Kong (1800s–1930s)/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

This article has multiple unaddressed citation needed tags, thus failing criteria 2b. Also, per WP:GACN, book sources for quotations and statistics need page numbers. There are numerous statistics in the Population section and the Pandemics and disasters section not supported by page numbers. There are also quotations and statistics elsewhere not supported by page numbers.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 17:01, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Result: Delisted. It's been a week. There doesn't appear to be much interest in fixing these issues.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 02:48, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hard to believe that this rather messy article with the awkward title was once GA. Since it's redundant now as it was then, rather than fix its many issues, it should be merged into British Hong Kong. There should only be one article on colonial Hong Kong, not two. --Lubiesque (talk) 13:51, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]