Talk:History of FK Vojvodina
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Coren SearchBot
[edit]I think the copyright tag is a mistake. The Youtube video which it cited as having the copyrighted material is an amateur video of the club's centennial celebration, and has virtually no textual content. To clarify, the whole reason I made the separate article for "History of FK Vojvodina" is because the History section on the article FK Vojvodina was getting too long. This has already been practiced for other clubs, such as History of FK Partizan, History of Red Star Belgrade, History of FC Barcelona, etc. Nowhere77 (talk) 21:05, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on History of FK Vojvodina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130703200555/http://sport.blic.rs/vojvodina/vesti/191495/Kacar-ispred-Krasica-u-Vosinom-timu-decenije to http://sport.blic.rs/vojvodina/vesti/191495/Kacar-ispred-Krasica-u-Vosinom-timu-decenije
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120703190633/http://www.fkvojvodina.rs/klub/istorijat/sumorne-devedesete/ to http://www.fkvojvodina.rs/klub/istorijat/sumorne-devedesete/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)