Talk:History of Dover

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Kent

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Untitled

I have transferred the information here from the Dover article, since it overwhelmed it. Much of the information lacks references: and a good deal of rewriting, since it is somewhat bitty. I have also suggested that the article Dubris belongs more properly within the confines of this article (and repeats itself too). There are innumerable catagories as well: including Category:Napoleonic defences of Dover (two entries); Category:Forts in Dover (two entries]]; and Category:History of Dover.

Now it has been speedy deleted but I am contesting that Peter Shearan (talk) 07:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I looked the article over thoroughly before tagging it for speedy deletion. It was a word-for-word copy of this website. The short intro paragraph was the only part not taken from that site. I wasn't clear on whether you copied it from Dover or where it came from exactly, but all the text was copyvio. --L. Pistachio (talk) 07:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From my reading of the revisions, I am sure that the Wikipedia section came first and Kentfind's History of Dover page is an unacknowledged copy of our text that was made some time after May 2007. See the Earthquake section, where our copy originally stated: "The earthquake was said to be 5.4 on the richter scale."[1]. This was then changed by several edits [2], [3], and [4] to the version that appears on the other site. I think this is good enough evidence that there is no copyvio from kentfind.co.uk, so I'm restoring the deletion. Happy to discuss, though. —SMALL JIM 10:14, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another point in our favour: looking at the source of the Kentfind page shows that the photos are linked directly from WP. —SMALL JIM 10:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice catch. I guess I didn't look quite thoroughly enough. --L. Pistachio (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding being able to see Napoleon's troops in Boulogne, I doubt this, hence I've requested a citation. When I was growing up there, you could make out Calais on a clear day, but there was no chance of seeing Boulogne. Wavy (talk) 09:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Dover. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120204201023/http://www.deremilitari.org/RESOURCES/ARTICLES/goodall.htm to http://www.deremilitari.org/resources/articles/goodall.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

wtf?

What on earth is this supposed to mean, in the "19th century" section? It's been there since the article's creation in 2008. "The South Eastern Railway arrived in 1844 and cross-channel traffic boomed – the town were even combined with boat trains and the Golden Arrow service." GrindtXX (talk) 18:47, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]