Talk:History of Danish

Denmark High‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Terminological chaos

Hello! While the classification here seems to be the most common, I have also been able to find sources using Old Danish to refer to what is here called Middle Danish (see wiktionary:Old Danish), although these do not have linguistics as their primary topic. Worse yet, it seems that, over at Wiktionary, we are using Old Danish in this latter sense (see wiktionary:Category:Old Danish lemmas for examples), constituting a contradiction. Can someone confirm that one taxonomy is standard/significantly more common than the other?__Gamren (talk) 16:07, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Gamren: The periodisation of the Scandinavian languages is a perennial quandary (that I recall discussing with people not too long ago), but as far as I can determine, Old Danish is usually considered to be approximately parallel with Old Swedish and Old Norwegian, so would refer to the language of the 13th and 14th centuries. Before this period, I'd speak of the Danish dialect of Old East Norse, or Runic Danish. But this issue is better discussed somewhere else, like WikiProject Languages; nobody will find your question here except accidentally. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 22:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest using the periodization of Brøndum-Nielsen: "Old Danish" 800 AD to 1525; subdivided into "Runic Danish" (800-1100), "Early Middle Danish" (1100-1350) and "Late Middle Danish" (1350-1525).·maunus · snunɐɯ· 08:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of Danish. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:History of English which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 08:14, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]