Jump to content

Talk:History of Cape Town

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content. Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 15:26, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on History of Cape Town. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Historical population - percentages

[edit]

I'm a little confused why the percentages of population growth are presented. It seems to suggest information, but it's mostly misinformation as the time spans between the data points are wildly different. A 20% increase over 6 years (2001-2007; 3.09% per year) is actually much steeper than the 533.5% over 95 year (1.96% per year). Also the significance of the percentages is way too precise (I assume 40,000 and 25,000 are mostly estimates with a fair amount of inaccuracy).

Therefore, I'd suggest:

  1. Normalize the percentages to year-over-year or get rid of them altogether. (the template already offers this option of per annum growth rate)
  2. If we keep percentages, round them at least to whole percentages. Don't keep decimals.

If there's no objection, I'll make the change. effeietsanders 17:48, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. effeietsanders 04:22, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]