Talk:History Workshop Journal
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Historiography is NOT history from below as is stated in the article. Historiography refers to the history of recording history, where as history from below is the study of history from the common persons perspective. I would edit to fix this article but I know not which the history workshop is supposed to focus on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.123.191.246 (talk) 21:48, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Fixed?
[edit]I've fixed the formatting problem. This is a good start. Problems I can see are:
- the image is copyright - lots of solutions - the one Id like to think about is to freely license the journal front page if its it in your power
- some of it reads like a web site and not an encyclopedia article
- you don't reallt need to say "Blah says blah di blah". If the stuff is referenced then then can see who said it. it miht be appropropriate where the TES puts you in the top 43 journals
- I suspect you have a close association with this journal. THats not unusual but do make sure that you say so on your user page etc and don't say anything that might sound like promotion.
Hope that helps Victuallers (talk) 18:58, 3 February 2013 (UTC)