Talk:Historical reenactment in Australia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Historical reenactment in Australia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Historical reenactment in Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Reenactment (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reenactment, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ReenactmentWikipedia:WikiProject ReenactmentTemplate:WikiProject ReenactmentReenactment articles

Untitled

Its an article on Living history in Australia, and details the various groups and time periods that living history in Australia covers. This is an activity that 100's of people in Australia are active in, and is also involved in Anzac day activities. There is a already a general living history Page, this one is Australia specific. There is no producst or service being spammed or advertised. Deathlibrarian 07:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

living history page

can you please add our site to your site. New England Colonial Living History Group. Armidale. NSW Australia. http://woodsrunnersdiary.blogspot.com regards, 122.129.34.21 (talk) 08:41, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keith, I've added you under the 19th C. section, please advise if this is incorrect. Legviiii (talk) 13:13, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs more References

I think the article needs a lot more references, and aspects of it read like an add, particularly for the events. Would be good to see references for the starting years for some of the groups too. Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:37, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]