Talk:Historical money of Tibet

Tibet Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Numismatics Mid‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nepal Mid‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Xinjiang

Under Coinage, "End of the 18th Century" it mentions silver coinage: "as silver coinage was unknown in China during the 18th and early 19th century (with the exception of Xinjiang province).[4]"

For the record, Xinjiang was not "a province" until 1884. In prior times, this area had various names and governments, as either an empire in itself, or as a protectorate of some other empire (Chinese or non-Chinese). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.170.100.32 (talk) 23:39, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References to "China"

The word "China"　is used constantly in this article during the periods of the Qing Empire, yet this imperial system was not "China" but a Manchu dynasty which was built with the Chinese provinces at its center and using much of the Chinese bureaucracy. This can be misleading, particularly when modern states try to assert claims based on historical events. Although being the "ruler of all under heaven" was the role Qian Long fulfilled, he was also first and foremost a Manchu (which he specifically distinguished from being Chinese) not just "China" or "Chinese".

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Historical money of Tibet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425083140/http://gorila.netlab.cz/coins/Tibet/ONS_TangkaTibet.pdf to http://gorila.netlab.cz/coins/Tibet/ONS_TangkaTibet.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]