Talk:His Master's Voice (novel)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Cover Photo
[edit]This is the English language version of the page, right? I think it would be more useful to English readers to put up the most recent English cover instead of the Polish. For example, when I "like" this novel on Facebook, I'd like people to see the most recent cover so they'll look for it and read it. And why there is a photo of the Brazilian version seems pretty random for an English page as well. Genepoz (talk) 08:40, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Rename
[edit]I asked whether this article should be moved to His Master's Voice (novel) here.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:38, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Sounds like a good choice to me. I say go ahead. --Elonka 18:38, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
A fact from His Master's Voice (novel) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 June 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
++Lar: t/c 11:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Influence.
[edit]There is very similar book in English, called "Listeners" by James E. Gunn. I do not know if it was influenced directly by His Master's Voice, but construction of the novel is very similar. Maybe somebody knows more about it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:470:1F0B:527:216:6FFF:FEBA:E060 (talk) 16:48, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
My recent correction
[edit]At the beginning of Section 7 in the Book it is stated
The Project, when I made my appearance, had two concrete achievements to show for itself; they were actually one and the same, repeated independently in the biochemistry and biophysics departments. ... "Frog Eggs" and "Lord of the Flies."
Thus I corrected the page, where we now just have
Before Hogarth's arrival, the scientists were able ...
Oliver Kullmann (talk) 18:02, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Positivism
[edit]is not the position that scientists can proceed without being influenced by their attachment to the outside world. Whereas that position would strengthen the outlook for positivism as a practicable programme (and we are about a century late for that debate), it is not implied by positivism. 92.184.121.14 (talk) 14:20, 16 June 2023 (UTC)