Talk:Hippocampus anatomy

Anatomy: Neuroanatomy Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to neuroanatomy.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I retooled the intro a bit because it was a little talky and also started off with a very abstract topological discussion. While the topological discussion is somewhat useful, it may belong lower in the article than the introduction.

mcain (talk) 20:52, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the references in the talk about CA3: All references are to the same textbook, which gives an impression that the text is more speculation than science. Can the author please find those references? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.184.77.7 (talk) 08:40, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? The text is speculation because it follows a textbook? It's true that Wikipedia prefers secondary sources over tertiary sources such as textbooks, but I don't see how using a textbook makes it speculation. In any case you are welcome to supply better references if you feel a need for them. Looie496 (talk) 17:28, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Entorhinal inputs

Does anyone have a citation for the assertion that there is differential entorhinal layer input- that is, that EC layer 2 soma form the perforant path to CA3 and dentate while EC layer 3 soma input to CA1?

I have a citation that layer 2 soma form ppath (pubmed 9703026) but not that layer 3 projects to CA1. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MBVECO (talk • contribs) 22:17, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Found a citation for that: http://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/v9/n1/full/nrn2303.html MBVECO (talk) 22:01, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much any recent review of hippocampal system anatomy should mention that. Looie496 (talk) 19:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article also doesn't address the role of the temporoammonic pathway from EC to CA1. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.91.169.206 (talk) 22:30, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you will feel free to add any information you think belongs. Looie496 (talk) 18:13, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]