Jump to content

Talk:Hind bint Utba

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bias in the article

[edit]

This article seems to have implausible propaganda type claims made against the family of the founders Umayyad Caliphate.--Toddy1 (talk) 20:23, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quite an interesting complaint. Do you have any quotes from the article and the corresponding sources, wich you can use to debunk it? 86.80.208.136 (talk) 21:25, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is completely obvious that claims of cannibalism (for example) are just propaganda.--Toddy1 (talk) 21:27, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That she eat the liver of Hamza is an historical fact. 86.80.208.136 (talk) 14:50, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The source for the liver-eating story is Ibn Ishaq (p. 385 in Guillaume's translation). It reads as follows:
Hind bint Utbah and the women with her stopped to mutilate the apostle's dead companions. They cut off their ears and noses and Hind made them into anklets and collars and gave her anklets and collars and pendants to Wahshi the slave of Jubayr ibn Mutim. She cut out Hamza's liver and chewed it but she was not able to swallow it and threw it away. Then she mounted a high rock and shrieked at the top of her voice ...
A poem of battle-victory follows, but the authenticity of the poetry in Ibn Ishaq was questioned even in his lifetime. So the story is not Shia-against-Sunni propaganda. It may, of course, be Muslim-against-pagan propaganda.
It appears to be a historical fact that Hind was accused of adultery against her first husband (the story is in Al-Suyuti), although it is implied in the sources that she was innocent. The allegation that she was unfaithful to Abu Sufyan is not found in the traditional Sunni sources and may well be "Shia propaganda". Even these stories, however, look more like a description of a pre-Islamic polyandrous marriage than anything her pagan contemporaries would have called adultery.Petra MacDonald 22:30, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

"Merging" with Hind al-Hunnud

[edit]

This was the last version of "Hind al-Hunnud" before I turned it into a redirect. There was only redundant information to this article here; only one citation wasn't, that I transferred over. --Enyavar (talk) 14:53, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Year of birth

[edit]

I cannot find Hind's year of birth in the sources, but I tentatively suggest 581. Her father, Utbah ibn Rabi'ah, was born in 563, so Hind cannot have been born much before 580. Her son, Mu'awiyah, was born in 602; but she calls his brother Hanzala her "firstborn", suggesting that she married Abu Sufyan not later than 600. At this time she was old enough to have a son from her first marriage, and he was not a newborn, as she had had a second marriage in the interim. Therefore the range of possible dates for Hind's birth seem to converge on the early 580s.Petra MacDonald (talk) 22:30, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Year of death

[edit]

Do we know when she died? Currently, her death is reported to have taken place in 626, which is six years before she converted to Islam and ten years before she reportedly fought in the Battle of Yarmouk. Meanwhile, Wikidata lists her death as 636, for which there is also no source given. I'm going to delete both years. --Enyavar (talk) 19:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know the year of her death, but I do know that 626 and 636 are both wrong. Hind was still alive in the caliphate of Uthman (and, according to Sir William Muir, apparently refusing proposals of marriage!). I think she survived well into the 650s and perhaps even to the caliphate of her son Muawiyah after 661. Petra MacDonald (talk) 00:31, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hind bint Utbah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:11, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Hind bint Utbah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hind bint Utbah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hind_bint_Utba&oldid=1223532737"