Talk:Himegoto

Himegoto has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 17, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Anime and manga Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

"きゅんかわ！絶対押さえておきたい男の娘漫画おすすめ13選！". Bukumaru (in Japanese). Toppan. 2015-11-20. Archived from the original on 2021-07-05. Retrieved 2021-12-20.
https://honcierge.jp/articles/shelf_story/7419
https://mangapedia.com/%E3%81%B2%E3%82%81%E3%82%B4%E3%83%88-cxnarr38o

Re: Infobox image

I changed the infobox image from the cover of the first manga volume to the sixth for the same reasons why School Rumble uses the 13th volume's cover instead of the first volume. Adapting the rationale given on that image's fair use rationale in the other information section, there are three reasons why I believe this article should use the sixth volume's cover (which are also available on the image's page):

The first volume depicts only 1 main character when as early as volume 1, there are two main parallel storylines in the manga: Himegoto and its spin-off Himegoto+. The first volume would bias one toward thinking there was only 1 main character which the narration revolved primarily around, even early on.
One of the main reasons for manga covers is to depict the artwork of the manga author. Volume 1's cover shows an earlier version of Norio Tsukudani's art, which changes considerably as early as volume 2, and is the style used throughout the rest of the series.
Volume 6's cover is the only one to show any character other than Hime Arikawa, so there is no other alternative to showcase the protagonist of Himegoto+, Kaguya Arikawa.

--十八 22:44, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Himegoto/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 20:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Juhachi, I'll be reviewing this article to see if it can pass GA. From what I've read so far the article looks pretty good and may easily become a GA. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 20:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any reason why the manga's chapter list don't contain a summary? If I were to guess the chapters are completely unrelated (Just like when I got tired of writing summaries from Gintama's manga.

The official anime website has the the bluray. It could be used to replace the amazon link which are often criticized in wikipedia.

The reception section relies too much on quotes. Is it possible to paraphrase some of them?

Just in case, I recommend you to archive some links that you need like the first one.

Anywhere those are my issues. Good work Juhachi.

The manga doesn't really have a story that connects chapters together; in short, every chapter is essentially self-contained in its plot. The series is about 60 chapters long, so there would essentially have to be about 60 sentences describing every chapter.
I replaced the BD ref with the official website.
I tried to paraphrase some of the reception section, but it's hard since there isn't much reception I could find for this series to begin with.
I archived ref 1.

--十八 22:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I passed the article to GA. Congrats.Tintor2 (talk) 23:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Himegoto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140302001529/http://www.himegoto-tv.jp/goods/index.html to http://www.himegoto-tv.jp/goods/index.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303233719/http://anipla.net/a10826/tv/1 to http://anipla.net/a10826/tv/1
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303221948/http://anipla.net/a10826/tv/13 to http://anipla.net/a10826/tv/13
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140301074047/http://www.himegoto-tv.jp/ to http://www.himegoto-tv.jp/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]