Talk:Himalayan fossil hoax
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think this article deserves a better rating than "start-class"
[edit]The article is comprehensive, well structured, and well sourced. I think it exceeds the expectations for "start-class", and could do with another review. I'm brand new to wikipedia, so sorry if this is the wrong avenue for this! Micahtchi (talk) 12:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Fully agree. I’ve changed it to C class. GraziePrego (talk) 03:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Awesome! I am curious though, why? What differentiates it from higher classes? Micahtchi (talk) 03:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Peer-reviewed journal article published
[edit]The WikiJournal of Science has recently accepted a peer-reviewed article on this page, submitted by Chhandama. You can read the full peer review comments. If there are no oppositions, we would like to incorporate the peer-reviewed version into the existing Wikipedia article. Courtesy pinging @Micahtchi as they commented about the quality of the article just above. OhanaUnitedTalk page 17:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- No oppositions from me:) Micahtchi (talk) 05:16, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds fantastic! Happily support incorporating this version. GraziePrego (talk) 05:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)