Talk:Hillsong Church UK

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 May 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

Christianity: Charismatic Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Charismatic Christianity.

Australia

	Australia portal Hillsong Church UK is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Evangelical Christianity Mid‑importance

	Evangelical Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Evangelical Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Evangelical Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Evangelical ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityEvangelical Christianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Citation

Hillsong has the biggest single congregation in England; I am deleting that until it can be backed up by a reputable source.TheFunhead (talk) 21:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Colour Your World

I remember going to Colour Your World conference in 2001 or 2002 in London....it started much earlier than 2004 - can somewhere check it out? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.248.78.152 (talk) 16:33, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hillsong Church London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140528184428/http://www.hillsong.co.uk/ to http://www.hillsong.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:46, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removed 'multiple issues' maintenance template

I've removed the maintanence template:

As the majority of references are secondary sources, the majority of statements now have references and it was added 7 years ago. PandaWent (talk) 06:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the cleanup, PandaWent. I have often found that stale templates sit there for years after an article has been much improved! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"death of George Floyd" vs. "murder of George Floyd"

Hello, I am continuing a thread I started on User talk:Laterthanyouthink#"death of George Floyd" vs. "murder of George Floyd": I believe the term "murder" is the appropriate terminology, rather than "death of George Floyd". The pastor's comment about Floyd's murder occurred two days after Chauvin had already been arrested and charged with murder, so it wasn't a "Floyd's murder was a couple hours ago so lets wait and see" type of deal. Another user (Walter Görlitz has already reverted back to "murder" so I feel – at least for now – a local consensus has been established for "murder". Upon request of Laterthanyouthink I am posting here for better visibility and further discussion about changing this consensus to "death". Fwiw, the consensus at murder of George Floyd is very firmly established as "murder".-Ich (talk) 09:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for posting, Ich. Just to be clear, your last sentence doesn't apply to my change, as I have absolutely no issue with the article name, nor the crime being called a murder. It was only in the context of when this pastor made his comment, as it seems to imply that the crime had already been deemed a murder by means of a conviction being obtained when he made it. Technically, at the time, the only established fact was that Floyd had died, albeit under circumstances that clearly pointed to an unnatural death. And if you remember, there were those who argued that he had a pre-existing condition, was under the influence of drugs, etc. I don't feel strongly enough about it one way or another to argue the point further - but this is just by way of explaining why I deliberately chose to use the redirect rather than the article name for the purposes of referring to it in this article. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]