Talk:Hillel Slovak/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 15:01, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: Two found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 15:05, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:06, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Ref #5 failed verification.- Wait, have you watched the episode? All of the facts in the article are in the episode. Basilisk4u (talk) 18:56, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
No I haven't watched the episode. There is no mention of the episode on the reference supplied. It may have been there once, but it isn't now. If you are citing a TV show please use the correct format as per {{cite episode}}, specifying the exact time that the statements appear.Jezhotwells (talk) 00:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)- Oh! I'm sorry. The link seems to have redirected to a general Behind the Music page. I will try to find the times that the statements appear in the episode. Basilisk4u (talk) 01:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Wait, have you watched the episode? All of the facts in the article are in the episode. Basilisk4u (talk) 18:56, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, I have reformatted the episode stuff, I hope it is better now. Basilisk4u (talk) 21:04, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Other references appear to be RS, I assume good faith for off-line sources, no evidence of OR
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Thorough, without needless trivia
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- NPOV
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Captioned,
File:EarlyRHCP.jpg needs a specific fair use rationale for use in this article, see the notice on the file page.There is now a non-free FUR for this article, it is lacking for other articles that use the image. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:43, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Captioned,
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
OK, just two issues to fix. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:29, 13 March 2011 (UTC)- Fine, all in order now, passing as Ga. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 01:43, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Awesome!! Thanks so much. Basilisk4u (talk) 01:53, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Fine, all in order now, passing as Ga. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 01:43, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: