Jump to content

Talk:Highway 61 Revisited/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 13:14, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: Four found and fixed. I don't think Robert Shelton needs to be wikilinked twice.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 13:18, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Linkrot: One fixed and one tagged.[2] Jezhotwells (talk) 13:31, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your fixing and tagging—appreciated! Moisejp (talk) 14:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    To create the material for his next album, Dylan spent a month writing songs in his new home in the Byrdcliffe artists' colony of Woodstock in upstate New York.[31] Four days after the Newport Folk Festival, Dylan returned to Studio A on July 29, 1965, to resume work on his next album. next album - next album seems a little clunky here. as we are talkign about the very album in this article, it appears awkward.
    Allreet has made nimble edit in this clunky prose. Mick gold (talk) 10:11, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    The Wolk reference at blender.com, has gone dead, can't find it on the site.  Done
    I have removed the Blender Wolk reference. Moisejp (talk) 14:14, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Other online sources check out, assume GF for off-line ones to which I have no access.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Thorough and focussed
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    One image with a suitabel FUR.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Just a couple of minor points. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:47, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Ok, everything good now, another GA for the Big Zim! Jezhotwells (talk) 01:24, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Jezhotwells, Many thanks for your GA assistance. Mick gold (talk) 09:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, thanks a lot, Jez!! Moisejp (talk) 10:16, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]