Talk:Higher-Order Perl

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 April 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Computer science

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Perl (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Perl, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PerlWikipedia:WikiProject PerlTemplate:WikiProject PerlPerl articles

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Dominus (talk · contribs)

Untitled section

Does anyone know whether HOP will ever actually be made available online? The page saying that it'll be coming eventually was last updated in 2005, and the sign-up for the hop-volunteer mailing list doesn't work for me. JadeNB (talk) 16:50, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I´m wondering the same thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.146.102.47 (talk) 15:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is now available. I have updated the main page with a link. JadeNB (talk) 21:43, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

I would like to dispute the "conflict of interest" tag that was recently added. I am well aware of the potential for a conflict of interest here, and I have tried to take care not to make any objectionable changes. A look at my changes to this article will reveal that I am not a "major contributor" to the article. My changes were all extremely minor and, I think, inarguable. For example, I corrected the spelling of the title of the book and I linked some of the items in the chapter listing to the relevant Wikipedia articles. Aside from adding an infobox, I made only one significant change: I removed a link to my web site that did not seem relevant; I think this should demonstrate my good faith. —Mark Dominus (talk) 14:06, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

A user recently added a template that asserts that this subject may not be notable under the General Notability Guidelines. Whether or not that is true, I believe it is the wrong standard to use. The correct standard is the specific guideline for notability of books. —Mark Dominus (talk) 14:13, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Self Promoting Advertisement

This article is about a non-notable book and a non-notable author and is presented as a book advertisement. All of its sources are self-published with an interesting slight of hand by funneling them through advertisement programs from linux open source publications but it doesn;t pass the smell test. The Advertisement in China is a great example of this. Would recommend this article for better sources, and absent that, Afd. It's clearly a puffery piece. 166.70.60.63 (talk) 04:43, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]