Talk:High ground

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on High ground. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140421082726/http://www.languages.ufl.edu/emc/subscribers/vols13-14-1/Vols.%2013-14-1_Graff.pdf to http://www.languages.ufl.edu/emc/subscribers/vols13-14-1/Vols.%2013-14-1_Graff.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:48, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

High Ground still important in modern warfare?

It sure sounds like many aspects of holding high ground involve hand-to-hand combat and pre-radio/radar. Indeed, all the examples come from ancient battles.

However, I think as late and maybe later than the American Civil War, high ground was considered an advantage and I wonder how modern technology has affected this.--Jrm2007 (talk) 18:28, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 October 2017

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

the high ground is the most powerful and most strategic place to be in melee combat. a good examlpe of the high ground would be in the 2005 movie Revenge of the sith. when the fight between obi wan and anikan concluded obi wan gained the high ground and used it to his advantage, telling his old padawan not to try it. even though he underestimated his power obi wan still won the battle leaving anikan in the low ground Edit everything (talk) 16:46, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done You have not specified what you want changed. Also, the trivia you mentioned is useless for the article...at least from what I can see. ToThAc (talk) 18:16, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]