Jump to content

Talk:High-performance instrumented airborne platform for environmental research

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit request

[edit]

Please revise the page to the below text, which gives a fuller picture of the aircraft and its capabilities:

The High-performance Instrumented Airborne Platform for Environmental Research (HIAPER) is a modified Gulfstream V aircraft that is owned by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and operated by the Earth Observing Laboratory (EOL) at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, Colorado. The aircraft was purchased brand-new from Gulfstream Aerospace in 2002 and then modified by Lockheed Martin in Greenville, South Carolina over a period of two years, for a total cost of approximately $80 million.[1]

The unique flight characteristics of the Gulfstream V, plus the ability to carry 5,600 pounds (2,540 kilograms) of sensors, makes HIAPER a versatile airborne laboratory for scientific discovery. It can reach 51,000 feet (15,500 meters), enabling scientists to collect data from near the Earth’s surface to the tops of storms and to the lower edge of the stratosphere. With a range of about 7,000 miles (11,265 kilometers), it can reach many remote locations, allowing for sampling from the North Pole to the South Pole. Data collected by the aircraft and its instruments are essential for understanding environmental conditions and associated changes, including the distribution of trace gases and air pollutants, the formation of cloud systems, and severe weather observations. Instrumentation on the HIAPER GV has also played an important role in the calibration and validation of satellite instruments.

Each HIAPER GV payload is customized to meet the scientific objectives and research goals of a specific mission. NCAR, in conjunction with university groups and private industry, have developed and maintained a suite of highly-capable airborne instruments known as the HIAPER Airborne Instrumentation Solicitation (HAIS). In addition to the HAIS instrumentation, NCAR offers in-situ, remote sensing, and expendable instruments to be deployed from the aircraft. Typical payloads for scientific missions include a combination of these instruments with other instruments provided and operated by investigators from universities, other government organizations and private companies.

These instruments must comply with mechanical, structural, electrical, and flammability requirements. NCAR works closely with instrument investigators to assist with payload certification and integration, and maintains a Design and Fabrication Services facility that is capable of manufacturing airborne instruments and interface hardware.1 Data collected during HIAPER research flights are publicly available within one year after the conclusion of a research project and can be found in the EOL Field Catalogs.

References HIAPER Gulfstream GV | Earth Observing Laboratory. (n.d.). Retrieved November 1, 2018, from https://www.eol.ucar.edu/observing_facilities/hiaper-gulfstream-gv. Aircraft Instrumentation | Earth Observing Laboratory. (n.d.). Retrieved November 1, 2018, from https://www.eol.ucar.edu/aircraft-instrumentation. EOL Data Policy | Earth Observing Laboratory. (n.d.). Retrieved November 1, 2018, from https://www.eol.ucar.edu/content/eol-data-policy.


External links Official website | www.eol.ucar.edu/observing_facilities/hiaper National Center for Atmospheric Research Earth Observing Laboratory | https://www.eol.ucar.edu/ NSF/NCAR Research Aircraft | https://www.eol.ucar.edu/research-aircraft Research Aviation Facility Aircraft Instrumentation | www.eol.ucar.edu/aircraft-instrumentation HIAPER Investigator’s Handbook | www.eol.ucar.edu/content/nsfncar-gv-investigator-handbook Data Field Catalogs | http://catalog.eol.ucar.edu/

Categories: Gulfstream aircraft Meteorological instrumentation and equipment Atmospheric science research

Lauracsnider (talk) 18:59, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 07-NOV-2018

[edit]

  Edit request declined  
Your edit request was declined because the request was (A) not formatted correctly and (B) contained text which was insufficiently paraphrased from the source material.[1]

  • With regards to formatting:
  1. The citation note numbers are not placed within the requested text indicating which portions of the text the source is referencing. (See WP:INTEGRITY.)
  2. The citation style predominantly used by the High-performance instrumented airborne platform for environmental research article appears to be Citation Style 1. The citation style used in the edit request consists of bare URL's.[a] Any requested edit of yours which may be implemented will need to resemble the current style already in use in the article – in this case, CS1. (See WP:CITEVAR.)
  1. Submitted text ought to be written using an editor's own words and phrasing.

In the collapsed section below titled Request edit examples, I have illustrated two which identify the issues in formatting. The first example shows how the formatting of the edit request was submitted; the second shows how requests should be formatted in the future.

Request edit examples
Incorrectly formatted request:

Please revise the page to the below text, which gives a fuller picture of the Sun and the Moon:

  • "The Sun's diameter is 864,337.3 miles, while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles. The Sun's temperature is 5,778 degrees Kelvin."


<ref>https://www.booksource.com</ref>
<ref>https://www.journalsource.com</ref>
<ref>https://www.websource.com</ref>

In the example above there are three URL's provided with the claim statements, but these URL's have not been placed using Citation Style 1, which is the style predominantly used by the High-performance instrumented airborne platform for environmental research article. Additionally, the references have not been placed within the text at the exact positions where the information they reference resides. Using the correct style and the correct positioning of the ref notes, the WikiFormatted text would resemble the following:

Correctly formatted request:

Please add the following sentence to the first paragraph of the article's "Sun and Moon" section:

  • The Sun's diameter is 864,337.3 miles,<ref>{{cite book|last1=Sjöblad|first1=Tristan|title=The Sun|url=http://www.booksource.com|publisher=Academic Press|date=2018|page=1}}</ref> while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Duvalier|first1=Gabrielle|title=Size of the Moon|journal=Scientific American|issue=78|volume=51|url=http://www.journalsource.com|date=2018|page=46}}</ref> The Sun's temperature is 5,778 degrees Kelvin.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Uemura|first1=Shu|title=The Sun's Heat|url=http://www.websource.com|publisher=Academic Press|date=2018|page=2}}</ref>
Which displays as:

Please add the following sentence to the first paragraph of the article's "Sun and Moon" section:

  • The Sun's diameter is 864,337.3 miles,[1] while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles.[2] The Sun's temperature is 5,778 degrees Kelvin.[3]



References


  1. ^ Sjöblad, Tristan. The Sun. Academic Press, 2018, p. 1.
  2. ^ Duvalier, Gabrielle. "Size of the Moon", Scientific American, 51(78):46.
  3. ^ Uemura, Shū. The Sun's Heat. Academic Press, 2018, p. 2.

In the example above the references have been formatted according to Citation Style 1, which shows the author, the source's name, date, etc. Also, the reference notes are placed in the exact location where the text which they reference resides. As Wikipedia is a volunteer project, edit requests such yours are generally expected to have this formatting done before the request is submitted for review.

Kindly rewrite your edit request so that it aligns more with the second example shown in the collapsed section above, and feel free to re-submit that edit request at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions about this formatting please don't hesitate to ask myself or another editor. Regards,  Spintendo  08:40, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

  1. ^ The use of bare URLs as references is a style which is acceptable for use in Wikipedia. However, general practice dictates that the style already in use for an article be the one that is subsequently used for all future additions unless changed by editorial consensus. (See WP:CITEVAR.)

References

  1. ^ "Copyvio Results: Edit request proposal made by Lauracsnider in regards to High-performance instrumented airborne platform for environmental research". tools.wmflabs.org. Retrieved 7 November 2018.