Talk:High-heeled shoe

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the High-heeled shoe article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2019 and 16 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ivly12.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Paigee33.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Opinionated

I do understand that some have a strong opinion or preference and like to "inform" the reader to such a point that it might be interpreted as talking from ones soapbox. The Wiki style guide is pretty clear on how to do it. So why do I get the feeling that there is text here that was clearly not written from an objective point of view, but rather with the objective to "convert" the reader? Braab 17:51, March 28 2011 —Preceding undated comment added 15:52, 28 March 2011 (UTC).[reply]

What section are you referring to? Rudolfensis (talk) 12:42, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The whole article carries that tone. I see it, too. A few examples... the part that calls heels over six inches "foot jewelry" has an apologist tone; the part where it suggests ways to keep wearing heels even after they are causing obvious problems has a "convertist" tone... etc. It's pretty obvious, actually. 12.31.187.178 (talk) 21:20, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- In addition to this, relating to the 'Feminist Attitudes' category, has there ever been consideration to incorporate more information or links to feminist scholar work? In addition to that, would you ever consider adding a subset category of opposing feminist attitudes toward high-heeled shoes? I feel this category gives a very brief perspective when this section could go far more in depth. Msmoksta (talk) 21:35, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Historical High Heel Picture

The included "example" picture, The Vision of Saint Eustace, doesn't actually depict a high heel, but rather a rider with no heel at all who's wearing an extremely long (well-heeled?) spur. Perhaps the editor didn't know what a spur was, or what it might look like, and was thus confused by the mere length of the device.

Robert Graves, the guy who wrote The White Goddess, opines that high heels originated anciently for royalty because their hips were dislocated in a religious ceremony that left them "suspended between heaven and earth" and dislocated at least one hip. The special high-heeled shoes were thus a type of prosthetic aid exclusively used by those with a "holy deformity." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lee-Anne (talk • contribs) 02:12, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While on the topic of the photos accompanying this article, I must add that the photos of modern-day high-heeled shoes for women are atrocious. The shoes are cheap looking and do not properly fit the rather unappealing foot. The poor quality of the photography is also inexcusable. There are plenty of other, better quality images available which would more accurately represent commonly worn high-heeled shoes today, as well as displaying a more pleasant looking foot.Mindian (talk) 08:34, 27 April 2013 (UTC)mindian[reply]

Misleading "Health benefits of high-heels" section needs a lot of work

I think the section about health benefits should be removed, updated, or incorporated into the 'Health impact' section.

The section references a single study that suggests a single health benefit but is longer than most others. The way this research is presented now makes it seem like it contrasts with the health risks in terms of body of evidence; making the reader think there is strong evidence on both sides.

However, the whole section is not of equal value. I think it should be mentioned in a sentence or two under the 'Health impact' headline, as it references just a single study — hardly a good body of evidence. Also, the quotes from the author of the study seem somewhat off-topic.

Should I remove/edit it? Yay or nay. Rudolfensis (talk) 12:34, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would say don't remove it, it's a fairly useful section and I while it is only one study, I don't think its extrapolations go beyond the extent of the study. I would, however recommend at least two or three citations be added to the top part. One reviewer accuses "The way this research is presented now makes it seem like it contrasts with the health risks in terms of body of evidence" but the truth is that in terms of what is justified through citation there is equally little to support the above, larger section.Shatnertrek (talk) 04:08, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

History source

There is much clear and interesting history of the heeled shoe, including confirmation of its Middle Eastern (specifically Persian) origins, in this BBC article, Why did men stop wearing high heels? [1]. Can you help add it in? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.49.231.15 (talk) 08:53, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done, although the ref could still be used in more places. Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 14:07, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Foot and tendon problems

The Wikipedia article states that high heels causes the Achilles tendon to shorten, but the reference's summary states that the tendon thickens and stiffens, while the muscle shortens. This seems like an important difference to fix, since muscles are relatively easy to stretch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbo5112 (talk • contribs) 16:49, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't actually only high heels but any kind of shoe heels. Stiff shoe soles also contribute to the shortening of the Achilles tendon. 80.174.254.178 (talk) 17:01, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Link 1 is dead

We need to find a new source for that statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.53.164.158 (talk) 15:10, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copy/Paste Tag

I compared the given URL with the section that the Copy/Paste tag appears. I cannot see the copy/paste that is being spoken of. I am going to delete the tag for now, but if you can provide more details it would be appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Misha412 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Came here to learn about the origins and history of high heels

Instead I get told why women do or don't want to wear the shoes and how people perceive them to look on women, how they alter their appearance. You guys should just stick to the facts and avoid opinions. That way the article won't be overly feminist or sexist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.184.19.114 (talk) 09:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

site doesn't exist anymore

The site from reference 16, titled: "Glossary of Terms for Women's Shoe Styles", URL: www.sizefitguide.com/shoes/glossary-of-terms-for-women-s-shoe-styles doesn't exist anymore. Just found a copy of it on WayBackMachine from July, 4th 2010. A later copy from 2011 only contains advertising and the information of the site to be for sale. --84.60.114.129 (talk) 09:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Heels + car = bad

Nobody seems to realize how much of a hazard these things are when someone's trying to drive while wearing them. Anything over 3 inches or so can cause problems with throttle control and with braking. Extra-large heels can make it almost impossible to panic stop in an emergency. 104.60.70.104 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:29, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is indeed a scientific paper from Korea about this. It was found that even 5 cm heels lead to greater muscle activation in calves and muscle fatigue in ankles while driving. article Additional to your notes, another problem is that stiletto heels destroy car mats. I don't know the situation in the US. in germany it is allowed to drive in high heels but in case of an accident you could become in part convictable because of wearing not-suitable shoes. By the way, driving in high heels / female driving is also a prevalent kind of fetish (fast driving, pedal pumping, revving...) but it's hard to discuss this on wikipedia due to lack of serious sources. --Max schwalbe (talk) 15:14, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Egyptian High-Heels

The source cited for the Ancient Egypt subsection of the History section doesn't contain all of the information expressed in that subsection. The source only mentions Egyptian aristocracy and butchers. It does not mention the Ankh-shape in Egyptian heels. Additionally, the source may be unreliable, as it does not state exactly where it's getting any of this from. It lists a short bibliography, but none of the items in that bibliography refers to ancient Egypt, and it does not use in-text citations. The one link in the source's paragraph on Ancient Egypt is to another page on the same site, which does not actually contain a single reference to Egypt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.188.116.39 (talk) 21:02, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be an example of Wikipedia mischief where a "fact" is placed in a Wikipedia article and lo and behold, it turns up in "10 things you didn't know about ancient Egypt". I cannot find any reliable source for this history. Pictures of the shoes found in the tomb of Thebes are easily found on Google and they are not "high heels". The information was placed in the article by User:College4you on 5th November 2015 and was the only edit made by this editor. I suspect mischief but perhaps it was a good faith edit. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 12:14, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Types of heels

This edit added removable heels to the "Types of heels" section. Aside from the obvious issues that can be ignored or fixed (not minor, spelling mistakes, overstated claims, lack of sourcing) does this belong in this list? Removable heels seems a bit of a stretch in a list dealing with design styles. Perhaps this should be mentioned elsewhere inteh article ... not sure where since the article does not discuss teh material or method of construction. Similar material was recently added by another editor and was removed. I'm going ho remove the new addition pending discussion. Meters (talk) 17:54, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 6 May 2017

This edit request to High-heeled footwear has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

" High heels are not a modern invention but there is confusion regarding when it was developed. Research shows that high heels can be traced back to ancient Egypt. In the middle of the second millennium BC, Egyptians began to frequently uses sandals. Retention was obtained generally by the Egyptians by a T or V thong passing through the sole. Egyptian butchers also wore heeled shoes for practical purposes, that is, in order to keep their feet clean of any blood while slaughtering animals. "

There's no sources/citations listed for these claims. Also there's no actual proof for these claims in real world. 84.250.157.70 (talk) 18:21, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Research

Hello! I plan on doing some additional research on this topic. I have complied some sources and I would love any feedback or additional suggestions as I begin compiling all the information I hope to add! Medical research

Han D. “Muscle Activation of Paraspinal Muscles in Different Types of High Heels during Standing.” Journal of Physical Therapy Science, vol. 27, no. 1, 2015, pp. 67–9., doi:10.1589/jpts.27.67. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpts/27/1/27_jpts-2014-317/_pdf

High heels as supernormal stimuli: How wearing high heels affects judgements of female attractiveness - Paul H.Morris Jenny White Edward R.Morrison Kayleigh Fisher

http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.fandm.edu/science/article/pii/S1090513812001225?_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_origin=gateway&_docanchor=&md5=b8429449ccfc9c30159a5f9aeaa92ffb

Influence of high-heeled shoes on venous function in young women WagnerTedeschi FilhoMDNei R.A.DezzottiPhDEdvaldo E.JovilianoMD, PhDTakachiMoriyaMD, PhDCarlos EliPiccinatoMD, http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.fandm.edu/science/article/pii/S0741521412001176?_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_origin=gateway&_docanchor=&md5=b8429449ccfc9c30159a5f9aeaa92ffb

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.fandm.edu/doi/10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005538/epdf Joseph, J., Nightingale, A., (1956), Electromyography of muscles of posture: leg and thigh muscles in women, including the effects of high heels. The Journal of Physiology, 132 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005538.

Current Cultural Significance

https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2013/02/05/from-manly-to-sexy-the-history-of-the-high-heel/

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/in-the-trenches/200909/the-psychology-women-what-is-the-meaning-high-heels

https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/feet-of-engineering/

https://glamorousheels.com/high-heels-types/

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-21151350

Fashion Victims by Allison Matthews

Paigee33 (talk) 01:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)Paige[reply]

Neutrality of the article

I noticed that the authors and editors of this article have done a great job at keeping it neutral, and not inserting opinions. While reading, i noticed positive points about high heeled shoes as well as negative aspects to the type of footwear. The article was educational without being bias in any way.

Dresnick95 (talk) 00:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC) 2/5/18[reply]

Red heels

Why is this colour distinctive in the Middle Ages? Sign of nobility in Central Europe? Worth mentioning? ※ Sobreira ◣◥ (parlez) 09:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well-colored fashion was strongly limited in the past. Red, orange, pink ... required seldom pigments, for high society accessible only. Since high heels were a sign of being part of this class, they had red colored heels. Why not pink or blue ... good question. I'll ask Bata shoe museum if they have any hypothesis. --Max schwalbe (talk) 14:42, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 March 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: clear consensus to move the page at this time, but no clear consensus as to the best title. Per Shoe, WP:AT#Article title format, and the discussion below, I am moving the page to High-heeled shoe at this time. However, another move request can be initiated if necessary per WP:THREEOUTCOMES: "[M]ultiple names have been proposed and no consensus arises out of any, except that it is determined that the current title should not host the article. In these difficult circumstances, the closer should pick the best title of the options available, and then be clear that while consensus has rejected the former title (and no request to bring it back should be made lightly), there is no consensus for the title actually chosen. If anyone objects to the closer's choice, they may make another move request immediately." Dekimasuよ! 23:01, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

High-heeled footwear → High heels – No one uses the term "High-heeled footwear". Most of our sources use "high heels", and at least one of the scholarly sources uses "High-Heeled Shoes". Per WP:COMMONNAME this article should be renamed. Google n-gram says most popular is "high heels" followed by "high-heeled", then "high heel shoes". There are no results at all for "high-heeled footwear". I'm going to suggest we go with "high heels" as it's the most popular with both the sources and n-gram. Kendall-K1 (talk) 15:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. Dekimasuよ! 18:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom and common and most prominent name. "High-heeled footwear"? An odd extended name on the order of "Cowboy-themed hatwear". Randy Kryn (talk) 17:06, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and Randy Kryn. The original move rationale that "High heels" are a "slangy term" doesn't sway me, as it's an extremely commonly used term._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:43, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support this or High-heeled shoes which might be a little less informal. The problem is the "footwear" word in the title -- Netoholic @ 03:11, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. High heels is slang for High-heeled footwear / High-heeled shoes. A reference encyclopedia does not list topics under slang names. High heels is but part of the show, albeit the defining feature. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:29, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Support High-heeled shoes per Netoholic, "footwear" rings wrong. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:31, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Here's an n-gram for comparison which favors 'High heels'. Seems to be the common name. And per zxcvbnm, I never thought of 'High heels' as slang but as a description of a shoe style. Randy Kryn (talk) 05:18, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - Google ngram is alwasy interesting, but never a reliable source. It includes a lot of non-introductory uses. I guess it includes slang when used in quotes. Not sure why you use some capitals and case-sensitivity? "high-heeled shoe" show up OK. Support this, should be singular I guess. "High-heeled" is an adjective, and common slang involves using adjectives as nouns. Sure, modified to "high heels", but logically "high heels" is but part of the shoe. "high-healed shoe" is the correct adjective-noun combination. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:29, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      - I have to admit though, the article references support "high heels". --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose High heels
- Support High-heeled shoe Per WP:PLURAL this should be singular, as are (most) of our other footwear articles . See Court shoe, Mule, Peep-toe shoe, Platform shoe, etc. "Shoe" is also consistent with the other shoe names. Meters (talk) 05:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'm fine with ignoring that or updating it because speaking of shoes as a singular "shoe" in a title is weird. -- Netoholic @ 06:17, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - although, as shown and discussed in SmokeyJoe's comment above, the ngrams and page references strongly indicate that the common name is 'High heels'. I like the revolving shoe image on the page, I know a couple of women who'll appreciate that gif. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:32, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose High heels, Support High-heeled shoes, Although High heels is the common name we need to remember we're an encyclopedic and as such we should use proper words. –Davey2010^Talk 19:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As this ngram clearly shows high heels is the common and most familiar name. The last time 'High-heeled shoes' was the common and familiar name was pre-Civil War (appox. 1858). So using the "proper words" would take us back to before Old Abe gave 'em what's for. The page should be the at the title that most people expect it to be. Randy Kryn (talk) 20:01, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I never said it wasn't, Well that's your personal opinion, Without sounding disrespectful you've already !voted Support so I have no desire to argue with you over it, You're more than entitled to your opinion but don't start bludgeoning everyone who disagrees with you. –Davey2010^Talk 23:13, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. This one just seems so obvious though, but you're right, I've said my piece (several times). Randy Kryn (talk) 02:47, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support High heels. Did we suddenly throw WP:COMMONNAME out of the window? The current title and the proposed alternative, High-heeled shoe, sound really stilted; I don't agree that it sounds slangy or too informal, as evident in countless book titles, many strictly about the subject. Let us remember that this is not only a technical subject, but it involves a significant anthropological and societal aspect, and "high heels" is the common, recognizable name. No such user (talk) 12:30, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Tee hee, "stilted" Red Slash 23:28, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per common name Red Slash 23:28, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: "High heels" is very modern slang almost exclusively associated with women's shoes. Since this article goes into historical origins and development for both sexes, then "high-heeled shoes" is less narrow and more encyclopedic. I think few people would say King Louis is wearing "high heels" (no matter how great his gams look). -- Netoholic @ 11:16, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Google links for Louis XIV and high heels. (apologies to Davey2010, pertinent links to "few people would say" comment. Lots of people say.) Randy Kryn (talk) 11:39, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really want me to dissect those keyword-skewed search results? In the BBC article, when mentioning Louis, they don't use "high heels" as implied in the sensationalist title, but rather "red heels". In the NY Post article, they use "red heels and soles". The ABC article uses "heels" and "red heeled shoes", and "high heeled shoes" in the sections about Louis ("high heels" nowhere except a non-Louis photo caption). After that, the reliable source results stop being so tailored to your keywords and use "high heeled shoes" more. Not impressed. -- Netoholic @ 12:24, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I went 40 mentions in and 'high heels' was predominate in mentions, not only in headlines but in the pages. The term 'high heels' is the common name in the google search engine for Louis's shoes. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:12, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose High heels and Support High-heeled shoes. I think there's good arguments on both sides but in this case I favor the arguments to go with High-heeled shoes. -- Dane ^talk 17:50, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose high heels as inaccurate (the article is not about the heels per se), but support high-heeled shoe as more accurate (all high-heeled footware is/are shoes; the singular matches the "parent article", shoe). — AjaxSmack 02:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support. It is not uncommon to refer to something by a term that technically only refers to one aspect of it, but really means the entire thing. A hoodie is more than just a hood, Blackshirts were technically people who happened to have black shirts, etc. "High heels" could, in a very specific context, potentially mean just the heels, but without context surely means the entire shoe. And is the WP:COMMONNAME. SnowFire (talk) 15:47, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Adding Content

I am planning on adding to this article especially to the Medical Research Subtopic. Additionally, I would like to expand the Dancing subtopic as well. If there are any suggestions, please let me know. Ivly12 (talk) 13:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ivly12, I think it should be added that the primary cause of injuries (but also the attractivness) of wearing high heels is because of the plantar flexion. I've just added an image that shows this. --Max schwalbe (talk) 11:37, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Kutoo.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:21, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Poor Use of References

The problem with references is that one can be placed anywhere, and it looks like the argument is supported. However, references should be checked to make sure the reference actually contains data which supports the argument.

For example, the article contains the following.

"Some men see the cultural norm, which often mandates that women must wear heels to look professional, as completely unproblematic.[32]"

Reynaud 2002 is referenced and it is clear that the sentence was referring to the following:

"The male shoe fetishist conceives the connection between the feet and the shoes as unproblematic for the woman; she can slip in and out of them in a second and walk in them without being hindered. However, as women know, high heels can be a torture; they are pleasant to look at but not necessarily to walk in."

The problem is that Reynaud 2002 is a highly qualitative and emotive piece. It is not a scientific document which contains data, and therefore, it is inappropriate to draw the conclusion that "Some men see the cultural norm, which often mandates that women must wear heels to look professional, as completely unproblematic." The word "some" implies, at minimum, a substantial minority of men, and the data is simply not there to make that argument.

It would have been far more appropriate to reference a paper in which men had been surveyed to explore men's attitudes to high heels. It would also be important for such a reference to compare and contrast men's attitudes to high heels to women's attitudes.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Fur heel.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To add to article

Basic information to add to this article: what "pump" means in terms of shoes (and where this name comes from). 173.88.246.138 (talk) 18:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph of models

I agree with Editor-1 that this image is inappropriate for the article. The shoes are barely visible and the rest of the photograph distracts from the article rather than complementing it. I can't see any reason to retain the photograph so have reverted its re-addition. @Editor7798: please do not re-add the photograph without achieving consensus here. Thank-you. Wham2001 (talk) 08:45, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wham2001: Hey there; i didn't add the photo to the article but also it already existed; Editor-1 deleted it; he deleted photo because of Erotic reason!!! WIKIPEDIA IS NOT CENSORED AND WILL NOT...Editor7798 (talk) 09:00, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My reasons to remove the photo are clear and straightforward, if I have removed that photo in another WP language and mentioned "Erotic", whether it was correct or incorrect, it is not related to this WP and this article and these reasons -- Editor-1 (talk) 09:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editor-1! Clearly you are lying...you deleted the photo from fawiki because of erotic reasons; see the reason of him to delete: [2]... now; user:Editor-1 is banned from fawiki because of WP:3RR and Wikipedia:Edit warring in same article by Ladsgroup...Editor7798 (talk) 09:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First of all it is not deleting, it is removing, secondly, I mentioned that "if I have removed that photo in another WP language and mentioned "Erotic", whether it was correct or incorrect, it is not ..." so I didn't hide it, but again "whether it was correct or incorrect, it is not related to this WP and this article and these reasons ", judging me per my edit in another article and WP and telling "Clearly you are lying" is against WP:Civility and WP:Etiquette and WP:Assume good faith -- Editor-1 (talk) 11:22, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to reply to all of the discussion above together. Firstly, what has happened on fawiki is not relevant here, and I would ask you both not to import a disagreement from another language Wikipedia into enwiki – I don't think that's constructive. Secondly, I don't think that WP:NOTCENSORED is important here: the issue with the photo is not its erotic content, but that it's a poor photo. Thirdly, I think that this photo is an improvement. Given the ongoing discussion it might have been more polite to discuss it here before adding it, but that is by the bye. I would like to suggest two further improvements, though. First, the photo needs a caption. Second, I think that it clutters the lead section, which already has a (more appropriate) photo. Reading the article (which is already over-illustrated) I think that it would go better with the section titled "Feminism", which discusses the sexualizing effects of high-healed shoes. I think this photo is a reasonable illustration of that, so I suggest that it be moved down to that section. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 12:09, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do agree with you, one of the reasons I mentioned in fawiki to remove that bad photo was this fact that the first photo depicts the subject as complete and very well from different angles, that bad photo is also very tall and renders out of the lead section; as the new added photo is erotic per its categories and its content, moving/relocating it to a section about using the high-heeled shoes in the pornography or erotic photography is more relevant, but since such sections are not exist already, moving it to the section "Feminism" as you said is the best approach curently. -- Editor-1 (talk) 13:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you agree and there have been no further comments I have moved the image as discussed and supplied a caption. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 19:30, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article sounding like a personal essay

I was wondering if anyone else thinks that the article doesn't read much like a personal essay anymore? I have made a few minor changes, adding in certain citations and removing some emphatic language that sounds more like an opinion than a fact, and was wondering if anyone had any other areas of note that make this article seem more like a personal essay that we could change? OzziO (talk) 19:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the tone of the article is a big problem @OzziO:. I've gone through and done a rewrite of almost every section in an effort to make the tone less argumentative, but I think it still needs a good deal of work. Winthrop23 (talk) 23:40, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]