Talk:Hierarchical and recursive queries in SQL

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Databases (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases articles

Is there any necessity for this incomplete article? Isn't it better just reference some good explanation (inside some article about queries) of the same topic than writing a bad article?--216.54.171.18 (talk) 14:38, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why non-standard CONNECT BY construct before the standard solution?

Is there a reason why the non-standard CONNECT BY construct comes before the standard CTE solution?

I guess most readers what the important information at the top. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guettli (talk • contribs) 07:46, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction doesn't include MariaDB's support

So it seems out of date at least on this point — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuxayo (talk • contribs) 17:03, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why not ISO/ANSI SQL terminology?

The SQL standard uses the term <with clause>, not "cte". I know cte is popular, but I would mention that as an vendor alternatative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fjerdingen (talk • contribs) 22:22, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]