Talk:Hiddensee treasure

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Norse history and culture

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the North Germanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyright

Cut/paste of [1] and research.omicsgroup.org/index.php/Hiddensee. Jbh ^Talk 14:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a problem? RhinoMind (talk) 22:46, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, half of the article is a direct quote and not attributed as such.. no "". WP:COPYRIGHT, WP:CITE. Articles should be written in your own words. Jbh ^Talk 23:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article is brand new, and it should be no problem to reword a few lines, instead of complaining here. When a text is copied from a public, non-commercial source, I cannot see it is such a big problem really, but I guess someone had to point it out explicitly perhaps. Anyway I have worked a bit on the article now, putting in new information and some useful links. PS. I didn't start the article and take no responsibility for its initial state. I was just curious when I asked my question above that is all. RhinoMind (talk) 00:04, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are doing some good work. The note here was to explain the 'Copyright' tag I placed when I reviewed it. Unless the text is public domain it matters quite a bit - even then its status needs to be noted.

If you do not end up rewording those sections in your improvements I work on them sometime in the next couple of days. Cheers. Jbh ^Talk 00:24, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Jbh ^Talk 13:53, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]