Talk:Hey Daddy (Daddy's Home)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 07:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Album images needs to be 300px or smaller to qualify for fair use.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall: The article meets all requirements except for the image size of the album. I will put this on hold until it is fixed.
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comment There is the case of unformatted reference, italicization of online sources and no alternate text for the images. Without addressing these issues the article cannot be passed. --Legolas (talk2me) 08:19, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for fixing the image. Now the references need to be fixed. Please see WP:REF for more information on how references need to be presented. -- S Masters (talk) 09:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- Everything should be fixed now! Candyo32 (talk) 23:16, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- There are still issues with the references. As Legolas2186 pointed out, there are italics where there shouldn't be (retrieved dates), and there are formatting codes like {{ and [[ showing. -- S Masters (talk) 04:40, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hopefully, everything is fixed but there is something iffy with #13, other than that I think I got everything else. Candyo32 (talk) 22:28, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- There are still issues with the references. As Legolas2186 pointed out, there are italics where there shouldn't be (retrieved dates), and there are formatting codes like {{ and [[ showing. -- S Masters (talk) 04:40, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- Everything should be fixed now! Candyo32 (talk) 23:16, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for fixing the image. Now the references need to be fixed. Please see WP:REF for more information on how references need to be presented. -- S Masters (talk) 09:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Final summary: Thanks for all the hard work and fixes. I am confident that the article now meets all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to list it. Well done! - S Masters (talk) 10:26, 28 April 2010 (UTC)